I am wanting to replace a Maryland bridge I have had since I was 18 years old (I am 42 now). It replaces my tooth #10. The replacement front tooth is too dark or yellowed and I am wanting to have my teeth bleached. I am also unhappy with the gray that shows thru on #9 and #11. My general dentist suggested a conventional bridge to replace the Maryland bridge and possibly a lumineer on #8 so it would look more symmetrical. Does this sound like a good idea to you?
- Lori from Missouri
Lori,
So you have an existing Maryland bridge replacing one of your lateral incisors. As is typical with a Maryland bridge, the metal framework that holds in the false tooth darkens a little bit the natural teeth that it is attached to.
If you want something nicer, in my opinion you have two options. One would be to have a conventional bridge, which would involve crowning the two adjacent teeth and suspending the false tooth between them. The other would be to have a single dental implant replacing this tooth. To read about the advantages and disadvantages of these two treatments, you can read my implant vs bridge page on my implant dentistry website.
It worries me that your dentist wants to put a Lumineer on your front tooth just for the purpose of matching the bridge. I’m worried that this indicates that your dentist doesn’t have confidence in his ability to match the porcelain to your natural tooth. Porcelain can be tinted and shaped to match a natural tooth, and my opinion is that this would be the way to go, if you choose the bridge.
But if he or she can’t match the bridge to your natural tooth, then I wonder how your dentist plans to match the Lumineer to the bridge. That is just as hard, maybe harder. Unless there’s something particular about your case that I don’t know, on the surface this seems like unnecessary treatment.
Other links:
Check our Los Angeles gentle dentistry page.
Read about Los Angeles white fillings.